Suspensory ligament desmitis represents one of the most common causes of lameness in athletic horses across all disciplines.
Overview and Clinical Importance
Suspensory ligament desmitis represents one of the most common causes of lameness in athletic horses across all disciplines. The suspensory ligament (also known as the interosseous muscle or musculus interosseus medius) is a critical component of the equine suspensory apparatus, serving to prevent hyperextension of the metacarpophalangeal (fetlock) joint during weight bearing. Understanding the anatomy, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of suspensory ligament injuries is essential for NAVLE success and clinical practice.
Injuries to this structure can affect any region of the ligament and occur in both forelimbs and hindlimbs. The clinical presentation, treatment approach, and prognosis differ significantly based on lesion location and severity, making accurate diagnosis critical for appropriate case management.
| Region |
Anatomical Description |
Clinical Significance |
| Proximal (Origin) |
Proximal one-third of metacarpus/metatarsus; contains muscle fibers; includes enthesis (bone attachment) |
Most common injury site in dressage horses (hindlimb); prognosis varies significantly between forelimb (good) and hindlimb (guarded) |
| Body (Mid-region) |
Middle third; primarily tendinous tissue; relatively uniform structure |
Most common in racehorses, especially Standardbreds; high recurrence rate if horse returns to previous workload |
| Branches (Distal) |
Bifurcates at approximately the distal third; medial and lateral branches insert on abaxial surface of proximal sesamoid bones |
Common in jumpers and Standardbreds; frequently associated with sesamoid bone pathology; medial branch often affected due to limb conformation |
Functional Anatomy of the Suspensory Ligament
The suspensory ligament is an evolutionary derivative of the interosseous muscle found in other species. In horses, this structure has become predominantly tendinous (ligamentous), though it retains some muscle fibers, particularly in the proximal region. This mixed composition is clinically important and can complicate ultrasonographic interpretation.
Origin and Course
Forelimb: The suspensory ligament originates from the proximal palmar aspect of the third metacarpal bone (MCIII) and the distal row of carpal bones. It lies within the groove formed between the second and fourth metacarpal (splint) bones, deep to the superficial and deep digital flexor tendons.
Hindlimb: Origin occurs at the proximal plantar aspect of the third metatarsal bone (MTIII) and the plantar aspect of the distal tarsal bones. The hindlimb proximal suspensory region is contained within a more restricted canal formed by the large heads of the second and fourth metatarsal (splint) bones and overlying fascia, which has important clinical implications.
Regional Division
The suspensory ligament is clinically divided into three regions based on anatomical features and injury patterns:
Insertion and Continuation
Each branch inserts on the abaxial surface of the ipsilateral proximal sesamoid bone. Small extensor branches continue distally to join the common/long digital extensor tendon on the dorsal aspect of the proximal phalanx. The suspensory apparatus continues distally as the distal sesamoidean ligaments (straight, oblique, cruciate, and short), which originate from the base of the proximal sesamoid bones and insert in the palmar/plantar pastern region.
High-YieldThe main function of the suspensory ligament is to prevent hyperextension of the fetlock joint. It acts as a spring mechanism, stretching during weight bearing to absorb shock and store elastic energy, then recoiling to assist limb flight. Complete disruption of the suspensory apparatus results in catastrophic fetlock hyperextension (breakdown).
| Risk Factor Category |
Specific Factors and Clinical Relevance |
| Discipline/Use |
Dressage horses: hindlimb proximal suspensory (collected work). Racehorses: body and branches (Standardbreds more than Thoroughbreds). Jumpers: branches (landing forces). Western performance: proximal hindlimb |
| Conformation |
Straight hocks or fetlock hyperextension: poor candidates for hindlimb proximal suspensory surgery. Toe-in/toe-out: uneven branch loading. Back at the knee (calf-kneed): increased suspensory strain |
| Foot Balance |
Long-toe/low-heel: delays breakover, increases fetlock extension. Medial-lateral imbalance: uneven loading of branches. Short shoes with inadequate heel support |
| Footing |
Deep, soft footing: increased fetlock extension and suspensory strain. Hard surfaces: increased concussion. Unstable footing: aberrant motion and stress |
| Age/Previous Injury |
Previous suspensory injury significantly increases re-injury risk (scar tissue is weaker than normal ligament). Age-related degeneration reduces tissue elasticity |
Etiology and Risk Factors
Suspensory ligament injuries typically result from acute overload, chronic repetitive microtrauma, or a combination of both. Understanding risk factors is essential for prevention and case management.
| Block Type |
Structures Desensitized |
Clinical Use |
| Low 4-Point (Abaxial Sesamoid) |
Suspensory branches and body (variable), fetlock and distal structures |
Rules out distal limb pain; alleviates branch and body desmitis pain |
| Lateral Palmar/Plantar Nerve Block |
Most of suspensory ligament; pain from origin variably blocked |
Caution: perineural blocks above palmar digital nerves can affect intra-articular structures |
| Local Infiltration (Proximal SL) |
Proximal suspensory origin directly; perform with leg non-weight bearing |
Best for confirming proximal suspensory pain when lateral palmar block is inconclusive; perform BEFORE ultrasound to avoid artifact |
| Fetlock Joint Block |
Fetlock joint structures; portion of branch insertions lies subsynovially |
Use intra-articular blocks to help rule out fetlock vs pastern problems in branch desmitis cases |
Clinical Presentation
Clinical signs vary significantly based on lesion location, severity, and chronicity. A thorough understanding of presentation patterns aids in clinical suspicion and targeted diagnostic workup.
Proximal Suspensory Desmitis (PSD)
Forelimb PSD
- Lameness: Mild to moderate; often more evident on soft ground and when lame leg is on outside of circle
- Gait pattern: Advancing leg lameness (maximal head excursion during swing phase)
- Palpation: Pain on direct pressure to proximal palmar metacarpus; may detect heat or swelling in acute cases
- Flexion tests: Variable positive response to distal limb and carpal flexion
- Bilateral involvement: Common; may present as gait quality change rather than distinct lameness
Hindlimb PSD
- Lameness: Shortened cranial phase of stride; often worse with leg on outside of circle
- Palpation: Usually NO detectable swelling or sensitivity due to large splint bone heads obscuring the region
- Flexion tests: Often equally positive to all three hindlimb flexions
- Bilateral involvement: Very common; may cause reluctance to back
- Ridden signs: Loss of impulsion, resistant behavior, decreased hindlimb engagement
NAVLE TipOn NAVLE, remember that hindlimb proximal suspensory desmitis is extremely difficult to diagnose by palpation alone because the large splint bone heads completely obscure the ligament. Diagnostic anesthesia is essential for localization, and bilateral involvement is the rule rather than the exception in dressage horses.
Suspensory Body Desmitis
- Most common in Thoroughbred and Standardbred racehorses
- Lameness: Variable; may be absent in chronic cases
- Palpation: Enlargement of ligament body; local heat, swelling, and pain in acute cases
- Caution: Pain on palpation of forelimb suspensory is common in horses with other primary problems and is NOT diagnostic in isolation
Suspensory Branch Desmitis
- Often only single branch in single limb affected; both branches can be involved, especially in hindlimbs
- Lameness: Varies from mild to moderate; may improve within days
- Local signs: Heat, swelling on one side of fetlock; thickening over affected branch (best detected with leg elevated)
- Palpation: Pain with direct pressure or fetlock flexion
- Associated findings: Fetlock joint effusion, digital flexor tendon sheath effusion, sesamoiditis, avulsion fractures
- Flexion test: Strong positive distal limb flexion
| Finding |
Clinical Interpretation |
| Increased cross-sectional area (enlargement) |
Measure and compare to contralateral limb and normal reference ranges; always consider bilateral involvement |
| Hypoechoic regions |
Areas of decreased echogenicity indicate fiber disruption, hemorrhage, or edema; well-defined vs diffuse patterns have different implications |
| Anechoic regions (core lesions) |
Complete fiber disruption with fluid accumulation; indicates more severe injury; assess for branch splits |
| Poor margin definition |
Especially dorsally at proximal region; indicates periligamentous inflammation or adhesions |
| Disrupted fiber pattern |
Loss of normal parallel fiber alignment on longitudinal views; indicates active or healing injury |
| Hyperechoic foci |
Mineralization, chronic scar tissue, or enthesophyte formation; indicates chronicity |
Diagnostic Approach
Diagnostic Anesthesia
Regional anesthesia is essential for localizing pain to the suspensory ligament, particularly for proximal lesions and hindlimb pathology.
Ultrasonography
Ultrasound is the primary imaging modality for suspensory ligament evaluation. A systematic approach examining the entire ligament (origin, body, and branches) in both transverse and longitudinal orientations is essential.
Ultrasonographic Findings in Suspensory Desmitis
High-YieldThe presence of small hypoechoic and anechoic areas in the proximal suspensory region may represent normal muscle fiber content rather than pathology. Many horses have ultrasonographically abnormal-appearing proximal suspensory ligaments that are NOT clinically lame. Always correlate imaging findings with clinical assessment and diagnostic anesthesia results.
Hindlimb Imaging Considerations
The hindlimb proximal suspensory region presents unique imaging challenges. The best acoustic window is plantar-medial. A small stand-off pad improves contact. Perform ultrasound BEFORE diagnostic blocks to avoid creating sonographic artifacts from injected fluid.
Radiography
Radiographs should always accompany ultrasound in suspected suspensory desmitis to evaluate bony involvement:
- Proximal region: Enthesophyte formation, sclerosis, cortical irregularity at suspensory origin
- Branches: Sesamoiditis, avulsion fractures at proximal sesamoid apices, osteolysis
- Splint bones: Concurrent fractures, especially with branch injuries
Advanced Imaging
MRI: Gold standard for proximal suspensory ligament evaluation. Detects subtle changes not visible on ultrasound and allows concurrent assessment of bony structures. Particularly valuable for hindlimb PSD where ultrasound may be inconclusive.
Nuclear Scintigraphy: Useful for detecting concurrent or primary osseous injury at the suspensory attachment, especially when clinical presentation suggests bone involvement or when localizing lesions in complex cases.
| Modality |
Protocol and Indications |
| Rest and Controlled Exercise |
Mainstay of treatment. Stall rest with hand walking for first 8-12 weeks. Gradual return to work over 8-9 months. Pasture turnout is NOT controlled exercise and risks re-injury. Serial ultrasound guides advancement of exercise level. |
| NSAIDs |
Phenylbutazone or flunixin for acute inflammation. Use systemically in acute phase; topical anti-inflammatories (Surpass/diclofenac, DMSO) for local therapy. |
| Cold Therapy |
Ice/cold water therapy during acute inflammatory phase. Cold hosing 15-20 minutes 2-3 times daily for first 7-10 days. |
| Corrective Shoeing |
Address foot balance abnormalities. Support heels, ease breakover. Specific shoeing recommendations vary by lesion location and limb conformation. |
| Support Bandaging |
Reduces swelling during acute phase. Support wraps during rehabilitation exercise. |
Treatment Approaches
Treatment selection depends on lesion location, severity, ultrasonographic findings, chronicity, and intended use of the horse. A comprehensive approach typically combines multiple modalities.
Conservative Management
Regenerative and Advanced Therapies
Surgical Intervention
Plantar Fasciotomy and Neurectomy (Hindlimb PSD)
This combined procedure has become standard treatment for chronic hindlimb PSD that fails conservative management. The fasciotomy involves cutting the deep plantar metatarsal fascia to relieve compartment syndrome around the proximal suspensory. The neurectomy of the deep branch of the lateral plantar nerve (DBLPN) relieves pain from the proximal suspensory region.
- Success rate: Approximately 77-85% for horses with PSD alone
- Poor candidates: Horses with straight hocks or fetlock hyperextension (increased risk of further injury post-surgery)
- Complications: Iatrogenic suspensory damage, seroma formation, residual swelling, white hair development at incision site
- Post-operative care: Controlled exercise program similar to conservative management; serial ultrasound monitoring
NAVLE TipFor NAVLE, remember that fasciotomy/neurectomy for hindlimb PSD has an 85% success rate but is NOT appropriate for horses with straight hock conformation or fetlock hyperextension. These horses tend to incur further injuries after surgery because they lack the compensatory mechanisms to protect the suspensory apparatus.
Other Surgical Options
- Ligament splitting/desmoplasty: Creates channels in damaged tissue to promote revascularization; used for body and branch lesions with core lesions
- Arthroscopic debridement: For branch injuries with fetlock joint involvement; removes damaged tissue from insertional region
- Sesamoid fracture removal: Larger avulsion fractures at proximal sesamoid apices may require surgical removal
| Therapy |
Mechanism/Administration |
Clinical Application |
| Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy (ESWT) |
High-energy acoustic waves; promotes neovascularization, tissue regeneration, analgesic effect. Applied every 2-3 weeks for 3 treatments. |
First-line for mild-moderate PSD without major ultrasonographic abnormalities. Horses 3.8x more likely to return to work vs PRP alone in western performance horses. |
| Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) |
Concentrated platelets release growth factors (TGF-beta, PDGF). Autologous product injected intralesionally under ultrasound guidance. |
Best for contained lesions with central defect. Can be deployed stall-side. May be combined with ESWT for synergistic effect. |
| Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) |
Adipose-derived or bone marrow-derived cells. May promote more organized tissue repair than fibrosis alone. Allogeneic products now available. |
Reserved for more severe lesions with significant fiber disruption. Often combined with PRP. Good evidence for reducing re-injury rates. |
| IRAP (Interleukin-1 Receptor Antagonist Protein) |
Anti-inflammatory; blocks IL-1 mediated inflammation. Periligamentous injection. |
Considered for PSD without visible ultrasonographic lesions that fails ESWT; weekly to biweekly injections. |
Prognosis
Memory Aid - Hindlimb vs Forelimb PSD Prognosis: FORE = FAVORABLE (90% with rest). HIND = HARDER (less than 20% without surgery, 85% with surgery). Think: 'The HIND end needs a HAND (surgical).'
| Lesion Type |
Return to Work Rate |
Key Prognostic Factors |
| Forelimb PSD (Acute) |
Approximately 90% with rest and controlled exercise |
Premature return to work causes recurrence; most respond within 3-6 months |
| Hindlimb PSD (Conservative) |
Less than 20% without surgery |
Chronic nature of changes; compartment syndrome component; often requires surgical intervention |
| Hindlimb PSD (Surgical) |
77-85% return to full work for greater than 1 year |
Conformation critical; horses with concurrent injuries have 44% success rate |
| Body Desmitis |
Generally good; varies with severity |
High recurrence rate if horse returns to former workload; serial ultrasound recommended |
| Branch Desmitis |
Variable; 6+ months for clinical improvement |
Worse with fetlock hyperextension at rest or marked periligamentous fibrosis; sesamoid involvement worsens prognosis |
Degenerative Suspensory Ligament Desmitis (DSLD)
Degenerative Suspensory Ligament Desmitis (DSLD), also known as Equine Systemic Proteoglycan Accumulation (ESPA), is a distinct condition from traumatic suspensory injuries. It is a systemic connective tissue disorder characterized by abnormal accumulation of proteoglycans between collagen fibers.
Key Distinguishing Features
High-YieldDSLD is distinguished from traumatic suspensory injury by: 1) NO history of trauma, 2) BILATERAL/QUADRILATERAL involvement, 3) PROGRESSIVE course that does NOT improve with rest, 4) Affected horses have ligaments that feel HARD (not soft/swollen), and 5) Often in Peruvian Pasos or related breeds. On NAVLE, look for these features to differentiate DSLD from acute desmitis.
| Feature |
DSLD Characteristics |
| Affected Breeds |
Peruvian Pasos (up to 40% in some families), Paso Finos, Arabians, American Saddlebreds, Quarter Horses, Thoroughbreds, Warmbloods, Morgans, Akhal-Tekes |
| History |
NO history of trauma or high-impact work. Insidious onset. Does NOT improve with rest (unlike traumatic injuries). Progressive worsening over time. |
| Distribution |
BILATERAL or QUADRILATERAL involvement (both forelimbs, both hindlimbs, or all four). This is a key distinguishing feature. |
| Clinical Signs |
Progressive fetlock dropping (coon-footed appearance). Hock hyperextension (straightening). Suspensory ligaments feel hard and thickened. Heat, swelling of fetlocks. Severe lameness after fetlock flexion. Difficulty rising, prolonged recumbency. |
| Systemic Involvement |
Affects other tendons/ligaments (SDFT, DDFT, patellar ligaments, nuchal ligament), cardiovascular system (aorta, coronary arteries), and ocular sclerae. TRUE systemic disease. |
| Pathology |
Excessive proteoglycan accumulation between collagen fibers. Disrupted fiber alignment. Lack of inflammation (unlike traumatic desmitis). Proteoglycans resemble cartilage composition. |
| Inheritance |
Strong genetic component. Heritability approximately 0.22-0.25 in Peruvian Horses. Polygenic inheritance pattern. Genetic risk test approximately 90% accurate in Peruvian Horses. |
| Diagnosis |
Clinical presentation + ultrasound showing bilateral/quadrilateral changes. Definitive diagnosis requires histopathology with special staining (post-mortem). No reliable antemortem diagnostic test currently available. |
| Treatment/Prognosis |
NO CURE. Progressive and debilitating. Supportive care only: corrective shoeing, controlled exercise (every other day may help), NSAIDs for pain. Avoid polysulfated glycosaminoglycans (may worsen proteoglycan accumulation). Often requires humane euthanasia. |